Archive for Taxes

The Internal Revenue Service has been working over time thanks to all the new tax laws just passed. Thankfully they placed a rush order for their team to create the new form needed to allow employers to take advantage of some nice provisions of the HIRE Act.

Form W-11, “Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act Employee Affidavit,” is now posted on IRS.gov, along with answers to frequently asked questions about the payroll tax exemption and the related new hire retention credit. The new law requires that employers get a statement from each eligible new hire, certifying under penalties of perjury, that he or she was unemployed during the 60 days before beginning work or, alternatively, worked fewer than a total of 40 hours for anyone during the 60-day period. Employers can use Form W-11 to meet this requirement.

Most employers then use Form 941, “Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return,” to claim the payroll tax exemption for eligible new hires. This form, revised for use beginning with the second calendar quarter of 2010, is currently posted as a draft form on IRS.gov and will be released next month as a final along with the form’s instructions. Be sure to check with your payroll company or CPA to see if they will be ready. Read More→

On March 23, President Obama signed the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.” With the next installment on March 30 he signed the companion “Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.” Together, these two acts represent the biggest change in how the US finances healthcare since Medicare was created back in 1965.  Politics aside, It’s truly monumental legislation. Just as President Harry Truman gave us the “Fair Deal,” now Joe Biden — as he commented when he thought he was off mic — has given us the “Big *^@*#*@ Deal.”

Healthcare reform has been an intensely political process. Not one single Republican voted for the law in either the House or the Senate. And polls show that Americans are overwhelmingly confused and concerned. They don’t know just what the new law does, and they don’t know how much it’s going to cost. That’s no surprise considering the actual texts of the bills runs over 2,500 pages. I wonder if there is actually any single person who understands it all, not likely.

So that we can begin to digest all these new law changes let’s start with a brief time-line summary. Since much of the new law kicks in at different times understanding what happens when is step one. Read More→

As was expected, today President Obama signed the most recent jobs bill passed by Congress, the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act.  While many businesses are hesitant about hiring new employees within the current economic climate, “this jobs bill should help make their decision that much easier,” President Obama said during the bill signing.

HIRE Act 2010While I am happy to see some effort being made to help small businesses let us be sure to keep this HIRE Act in perspective. First, unless you were already considering hiring another employee the Act is not going to offer you enough hard dollar incentive to make a hire. For example, if you were to hire a qualified previously unemployed worker and pay her $30,000 this year your tax savings would amount to $1,860. Plus, if you kept her on the payroll for a full 52 weeks you would also get a tax credit of $1,000. Your total potential savings is $2,860.  You can see that while nice to have, it is not likely these tax breaks by themselves will create much hiring. But, for all you business owners out there currently debating whether you need to add staff, this just might help you pull the trigger and make the hire. Read More→

Comments (0)

President Obama is widely expected tomorrow, Thursday March 18, to sign into law the $17 billion Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment, or HIRE Act that passed the Senate on Wednesday on a bipartisan vote of 68-29.

hiring-incentives-restore-employment-actWhat, you have doubts? The Senate has approved legislation that provides businesses with a payroll tax exemption for hiring new employees.  Certainly this legislation is a positive step but let’s face it, employers are not going to run out and start hiring the unemployed for the sake of hiring, at least not unless there is a 100% refundable tax credit. After all, would you spend $100 to save a little over $6? Of course not. But, for those businesses that may be on the brink of hiring the tax benefits in the HIRE Act could make a real difference. Read More→

Mar
08

Ten Facts about Mortgage Debt Forgiveness

Posted by: | Comments (0)

Yes, the economy is periodically showing some signs of improvement but it is clear the country has a long slow up hill climb ahead before most of us feel the worst is behind us. This is particularly true for families still struggling with what to do with their real estate mortgages when the value of their property is no where close to what they owe on it.

In these situations more and more property owners are finding it makes more sense to take the hit to their credit reports and walk away from the offending property and let the mortgage holder deal with the loss. Setting aside the ethical discussion surrounding this, if you do have mortgage debt forgiven you walk into a whole new complex tax arena. If you’re not careful and plan appropriately

If your mortgage debt is partly or entirely forgiven during tax years 2007 through 2012, you may be able to claim special tax relief and exclude the debt forgiven from your income. Here are 10 facts you should know about Mortgage Debt Forgiveness and what may happen to you tax-wise. Read More→

Mar
01

Where is my federal tax refund?

Posted by: | Comments (0)

While we can all debate the wisdom of having paid or withheld enough taxes to be receiving a refund, the fact is when we do get a federal tax refund it sure is nice to have it arrive.

The Internal Revenue Service has been kind enough to offer a schedule of when you can generally expect your 2009 tax refund based on your filing date. The schedule covers your filing of your refund tax return all the way through the extended due date of October 15, 2010.

To review the refund timing chart or print your own copy use the following link. Read More→

As you can imagine, with the economy still reeling and tax collections dropping the importance of the governments’ oversight of our system of taxes becomes ever more critical. From both the federal and state levels we continue to read about new and improved compliance measures being put in place. Take one of the recent announcements at the end of 2009 from the IRS as an example.

The IRS has announced it will conduct intensive employment tax audits under its National Research Program (NRP) starting in 2010. This is a multi-year program with random audits scheduled to begin in February 2010. The IRS has said it will audit U.S. companies under this program. The NRP is a study and data collection project that helps the IRS update its noncompliance estimates and update its computer-based audit programs. “Normal” audits do not yield as valuable compliance data as random audits because the IRS, in normal audits, is intentionally targeting the taxpayers they believe have noncompliance problems. NRP audits on the other hand, are random to allow the IRS to statistically measure the total amount of noncompliance in a specific area. The IRS then uses this data to update its computers and estimates of the tax gap—the difference between total taxes owed and the amount actually paid by taxpayers.

The NRP audits are also much more intense and less targeted than a typical audit. The NRP audits allow the IRS to identify where the compliance problems lie in a specific population and to better target tax returns for audit in the future.

The goal of the employment tax audit program is to gather information in five categories: Read More→

With the recent release of some IRS statistics that the 400 highest-earning U.S. households reported an average of $345 million in income in 2007, up 31 percent from a year earlier and  the average tax rate for these households fell to the lowest in almost 20 years you can imagine the political hay that may be made.

Each household in the top 400 of earners paid an average tax rate of 16.6 percent, the lowest since the agency began tracking the data in 1992, the Internal Revenue Service statistics show. Their average effective tax rate was about half the 29.4 percent in 1993.

Here is but one example of the rhetoric already hitting. A quote posted at Bloomberg.com attributed to Chuck Marr, director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities has him saying, “two long-term trends: that income at the very top has exploded and their taxes have been cut dramatically.” It is no secret that this research group openly supports increasing tax rates so a statistic such as this is made to order for their agenda. Read More→

Obama agnostic on taxesNever let it be said that these aren’t some interesting political times. Our federal government has been spending money faster than the printing presses can create it and the politicos have yet to figure out how they plan to pay for it all. Forget the debate of right or wrong on the spending, the fact is the bill will be coming due.

If you’d like to get an idea of what may be coming down the pipe for us, Bloomberg BusinessWeek had an interview with the President you really should read.

President Barack Obama said he is “agnostic” about raising taxes on households making less than $250,000 as part of a broad effort to rein in the budget deficit. Now that’s a new way to be wishy-washy with an answer.

Obama, in a Feb. 9 Oval Office interview, said that a presidential commission on the budget needs to consider all options for reducing the deficit, including tax increases and cuts in spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

“The whole point of it is to make sure that all ideas are on the table,” the president said in the interview with Bloomberg BusinessWeek, which will appear on newsstands Friday. “So what I want to do is to be completely agnostic, in terms of solutions.”

Great… you can read the Bloomberg Business Week article at http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601090&sid=a1gLeuUUbQy8.

Print This Post Print This Post
Comments (0)

The state of California is getting even more aggressive at collecting all the taxes the law allows — no matter how small. Use tax is the latest way for the state to look for cash. The Legislature has enacted strict new registration and filing requirements for businesses with gross income of $100,000 or more.

california use taxUse tax is like sales tax but you pay it directly to the state, rather than to the retailer. The rule of thumb is: You owe use tax if what you bought would have been subject to sales tax if you purchased it at a local store and you did not pay California sales tax. You generally owe California use tax when you use, store, or consume — in California — tangible personal property purchased from an out-of-state vendor. If the vendor does not collect the California tax on the purchase, the purchaser must pay the tax directly to the state. If you don’t report and pay your use tax in a timely manner, such as with your income tax return, the state will assess penalties and interest. Read More→